frontier001
news-queue

A recent paper by David Hope of the London School of Economics and Julian Limberg of King’s College London found that tax cuts for the rich in 18 countries predominantly benefited the wealthy.

“Our analysis finds strong evidence that cutting taxes on the rich increases income inequality but has no effect on growth or unemployment” in the short and long term, the researchers wrote.

After major tax cuts for the rich were introduced, the top 1% share of pretax national income increased by almost 1 percentage point, they found.

Their findings counter arguments that tax cuts for the rich “trickle down” to benefit other people — which the researchers noted have been part of the rationale for major tax reforms in the US.

Supporters say tax cuts for the rich can lead wealthy people to put in more hours and effort at work, boosting economic activity, the researchers said. Other arguments for trickle-down tax cuts include that they allow wealthy people to invest more and benefit the economy.

Hope and Limberg analyzed major tax cuts for the rich in 18 countries that are part of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, including the US, Japan, and Norway, from 1965 to 2015.

Top incomes have risen rapidly since the 1980s — and as they grew, more tax cuts for the wealthy were introduced, the researchers said.

The researchers said their results were in line with a 2014 paper published in the American Economic Journal that suggested that lower taxes for the rich caused high earners to seek pay raises.

“Cutting taxes on the rich increases top income shares, but has little effect on economic performance,” Hope and Limberg concluded.

Taxes have been scrutinized during the pandemic as countries look for ways to fund COVID-19 relief efforts.

Earlier this month, Argentina enacted a one-off “millionaire tax” to help pay for its pandemic response. Fewer than one in 100 earners will pay the tax, which the government hopes will raise $3.78 billion.

Read More

yupwealth inequalityeconomics

108 notes

  1. dcurv reblogged this from news-queue
  2. ladygreytea76 reblogged this from gardenianoire
  3. mysterysciencegirlfriend3000 reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  4. earl-of-lemons reblogged this from spockvarietyhour
  5. fuckinmiki reblogged this from news-queue
  6. wolfrhamhart reblogged this from ibenholt
  7. onegeekandherpintofcoffee reblogged this from spockvarietyhour
  8. ibenholt reblogged this from spockvarietyhour
  9. greenribbon reblogged this from airyairyaucontraire
  10. funeralparlorchic reblogged this from spockvarietyhour
  11. airyairyaucontraire reblogged this from spockvarietyhour
  12. inconstantsearchofperfection reblogged this from spockvarietyhour
  13. comicbooknooktypeschtuffs reblogged this from spockvarietyhour
  14. spockvarietyhour reblogged this from frontier001
  15. reelaroundthedavekan reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias and added:
    Everyone: No shit, SherlockConservatives: Let’s give it 50 more years!
  16. joseph-lavode reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  17. hellcatblues reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  18. viking369 reblogged this from frontier001