tinsnip
Anonymous asked:

Can you elaborate on the idea behind Section 31? I've always seen it in DS9 as a symptom of the rot in the Federation, and very much agree with Bashir's arguments that they aren't a "necessary evil," but I feel that modern use of S31 has missed that crucial point.

writergeekrhw answered:

For me, Section 31 was not a good thing. I wouldn’t call it a symptom of a larger problem though. I don’t think the Federation is rotting. I think, like any government, even a nearly ideal one, it does have to deal with threats from time to time, both internally and externally.

Section 31 is an inner threat, a corruptive influence that could cause larger problems… but one that also does help with external issues sometimes, which complicates things.

For story, complications are good. For utopian governments, not so much.

Robert Hewitt WolfeSection 31DS9

161 notes

  1. resplendentgoldenwings reblogged this from writergeekrhw
  2. scifiromance7 reblogged this from writergeekrhw
  3. paradoxespersonified reblogged this from writergeekrhw
  4. mosscub reblogged this from writergeekrhw
  5. hmantegazzi reblogged this from opinions-about-tiaras
  6. terri104 reblogged this from writergeekrhw
  7. luther-sloan-secret-agent reblogged this from writergeekrhw
  8. sunlightwarden reblogged this from writergeekrhw
  9. perfectlywhelmed said: the real, serious question is what do we think transporter-clone!Boimler is going to do in section 31??
  10. atreides reblogged this from quasi-normalcy
  11. pulpwrit3r reblogged this from ralfmaximus and added:
    I do not have a high opinion of Section 31 or equivalent, non-fiction counterparts. Too much danger of becoming a...
  12. ralfmaximus reblogged this from quasi-normalcy
  13. quasi-normalcy reblogged this from writergeekrhw
  14. writergeekrhw posted this
    Can you elaborate on the idea behind Section 31? I've always seen it in DS9 as a symptom of the rot in the Federation,...