dduane
cleolinda

Threads update so you don’t have to:

I have not followed many people yet. As such, Threads’ algorithm is populating my feed with anything it can lay hands on. I have to assume it is not, in fact, using Instagram data, because if it were, my feed would look A SHIT TON BETTER THAN THIS. If you like American ball-centric sports, you are valid and I am happy for you, but I Do Not, and my feed is football and basketball posts as far as the eye can see. Also, streaming services’ PR accounts. Lotta Disney properties and Netflix. Something called Wasted posts constantly, I don’t know what it is. Someone who has a cooking show on cable. Various actors. Oh God, this is everything I don’t follow on Twitter. Why am I here.

I sat there muting accounts for like five minutes and then I had an existential crisis and stared at the wall for a moment. If all I’m doing is muting, why am I even there? If I weren’t on it to report back, would I just close the thing and never return? Will it get better as more people join? Part of my problem is that I’ve stayed off Twitter so long that I’m not even sure I enjoy the microblogging format, period, anymore. Maybe I’ll get back into the rhythm of it? But apparently I think in paragraphs, not short sentences. I like having room to clarify what I’m saying. I like the (comparatively) slower turnover of my dash.

The worst part is that you’d say, if you want your feed to be calmer, then curate your experience. Unfollow people. But I can’t, because Threads is shoving strangers at me. So is Twitter these days. Maybe Threads will become The Conversation™ the way Twitter used to be, something worth slogging through to feel “in the know,” but right now, from a usability perspective, it’s not.

yeah no thanksthreads

796 notes

  1. theycallmeskittles reblogged this from spyderqueen
  2. kriatyrr reblogged this from naiadkitty
  3. jesterbells said: @cleolinda glad to hear it–just wanted to make sure you were warned just in case
  4. littleredhotsridinghood reblogged this from icouldwritebooks
  5. cleolinda said: @jesterbells I have heard that, yeah, although they are apparently working on a way to uncouple that (citation needed)
  6. cake-of-awesome reblogged this from mirrepp
  7. icouldwritebooks reblogged this from wildishmazz
  8. jesterbells said: @cleolinda careful if you delete it–apparently that might also delete your Instagram account
  9. sp-milktea reblogged this from cleolinda
  10. howlatabluemoon reblogged this from dahllaz
  11. below-average-kazoo reblogged this from the-devil-in-the-details-666
  12. foggynemo reblogged this from linguisticparadox
  13. clownjacket reblogged this from cleolinda
  14. zial-shade reblogged this from mirrepp
  15. yitewewoteli reblogged this from cleolinda
  16. asseenelsewhere reblogged this from madtechnomage
  17. keian44 reblogged this from spyderqueen
  18. corvidvoid reblogged this from the-devil-in-the-details-666
  19. letsstickwithsam reblogged this from bathtimefunduck
  20. theboredsam reblogged this from cleolinda
  21. cleolinda posted this
    Threads update so you don’t have to:...I have not followed many people yet. As such,...