airyairyquitecontrary-deactivat
monsterinthegirlmask asked:
It's not art related, but I was wondering your opinion of this. I was at a zoo recently and I couldn't help but notice that nearly every non-western animal was "discovered" by a white male explorer. Uhm, so, no one ever saw any of these animals until white people did? Even though in the case of a few of them Chinese people domesticated them? Good thing white people showed up to discover animals so POC could finally be told that zebras and kangaroos are in fact not plants or hallucinations.
medievalpoc answered:

First of all, I laughed a bitter laugh at the last line, and second of all, you’ve underestimated my ability to make everything about art history.

Almost every “discovery” narrative you come across isn’t even internally consistent. I mean, have a gander at what is oft referred to as The Beowulf Manuscript, dating from c. 1075 in England. It also contains a manuscript called “Marvels of the East”, which is about people, landmarks, plants, and animals of the world. It’s also illuminated:

image

See? People, camels, some other stuff. Here’s a lizard:

image

Anyhow, what I’m getting at here is that the whole “discovery” narrative is silly, because it hinges on the idea of a totally isolated, racially and culturally
“pure” Europe that supposedly existed in “the past”, as in “before discovery!11!!!”, and that’s just not true.

I know a lot of joke articles make their way around about the laughable inaccuracy of Medieval European illuminations of “Exotic Animals”, but it has more to do with the art style and cultural factors than “ha ha this person never even saw an animal before”.

I mean, here’s a Medieval (c. 1250s) English Illumination of some people riding an elephant:

image

And here’s a Japanese painting from c. 1550s of some Europeans riding an elephant:

image

Basically the point I’m making is, 1. the “Discovery” narrative doesn’t work because the people who lived in the same places as these supposedly “exotic” animals obviously already knew what they were, and 2. the “Discovery” narrative doesn’t work because centuries ago, Europeans often knew what those animals were, too.

airyairyquitecontrary

however I would argue that the elephant in the upper picture is overcrowded; ten freakin’ people on one elephant? That’s a hazard to both their safety and the elephant’s health.

HistoryArt HistoryWestern CivAnimals*Discovereies*

452 notes

  1. nefariousnautili reblogged this from medievalpoc
  2. audreymgonzalez reblogged this from iamtehzuul
  3. iamveryattachedtomythumb-blog reblogged this from iamtheonethinginlifeicancontrol
  4. iamtheonethinginlifeicancontrol reblogged this from medievalpoc
  5. viva-zapata reblogged this from medievalpoc
  6. hauntedtoasters reblogged this from medievalpoc
  7. sirensoftitania reblogged this from medievalpoc
  8. ladykrampus reblogged this from medievalpoc
  9. valdara reblogged this from mykindascience
  10. alternatez reblogged this from medievalpoc
  11. iamtehzuul reblogged this from jenniferrpovey
  12. nrw-p7wyt reblogged this from medievalpoc
  13. snurri reblogged this from medievalpoc
  14. ourwayisinthenight reblogged this from medievalpoc
  15. maroonedoffvesta reblogged this from medievalpoc
  16. owlifer reblogged this from medievalpoc
  17. darklantern00 reblogged this from medievalpoc
  18. mariel2sabriel said: OH man! There was a monkey species which was ‘discovered’ a few years ago when a scientist found an African village keeping the species as pets. Why can’t we just say “documented”? cnn.com/2012/09…
  19. chimerical-charisma reblogged this from medievalpoc
  20. ratherunsaidly reblogged this from medievalpoc
  21. medievalpoc posted this