I love the design, it’s built with reinforcement and redundancy in mind and it’s symmetrically pleasing. Some versions either have a tiny deflector between the nacelles or torp launchers too. It’s a good workhorse and I tend to like it more than the Miranda class tbh.
I enjoy the attention to detail and random add-ons in the aft quarter
Cheyenne class:
There’s two versions that I’ve seen of Cheyenne class. There’s the smaller one with a saucer that’s never been seen in mainline trek
Kind of like a comtemporary to the New Orleans class (another I like which looks like a squat precursor to the galaxy class). In this version the nacelles make sense to power a ship that size.
Which is weird that they would have these nacelles still for that kind of ship. But I love this version more for some reason even though it makes little sense (like the Nebula class have fun using the saucer’s shuttle bay).
Finally the Prometheus Class:
kind of a bastard child of Trek, the Prometheus is Starfleet’s second modern venture into a pure warship. The lines are harsher and like the Constellation the ship is built for purpose-built for redundancy. It’s shame we never saw it in DS9 (althouhg its had a couple of token appeareances in novels) I don’t know if it has a role in peacetime Starfleet? It’s a space dagger that splits in three. Still not bad except for one glaring exception:
It has the ugliest bridge I have ever seen, and i Idon’t mean that in a good way. I think it even beats out the generic bridge sets we’ve seen for the other Prometheus (Second Sight) or Sutherland or the Enterprise-C. THis is just, terrible. But I’ll let it slide, its a prototype so I’m gonna say they changed the bridge module after this.
So yes in general I like the 4 nacelle configurations.
Except for one, glaring candidate. The Nebula class variant seen in Future Imperfect (The model in Riker’s ready room) and kitbashed in BoBW
startrekships