#the more you know

airyairyquitecontrary-deactivat
medievalpoc

Math and Science Week!

aseantoo submitted to medievalpoc:

David Unaipon

[x], [x], [x]

David Unaipon (1872-1967) was an Australian Aboriginal inventor, preacher and writer.

Nicknamed the Australian Leonardo da Vinci, he provisionally patented 19  inventions, but was unable to afford to get any of them fully patented. He also came up with ideas for a helicopter design based on the boomerang, researched the polarisation of light and tried to create a perpetual motion machine.

airyairyquitecontrary

These achievements are all the more impressive when you consider that, until 1962, not all Aboriginal Australians had the right to vote in federal elections (before that there were a number of restrictions varying from state to state, allowing some Aboriginals to vote but not others). Not until 1983 was it made compulsory for Aboriginals to vote, as it already was for all other Australian citizens. Aboriginal Australians have for so long, and are still in many ways, treated as sub-human, second-class or not even really citizens of the country they’ve inhabited for longer than anyone else living there.

In that context, imagine how hard David Unaipon had to work, compared with a white Australian with similar ambitions and talents. And he still couldn’t afford to get his inventions properly patented.

I’m a New Zealander, and our own colonial government did untold cultural, social and economic damage to the indigenous Maori people, causing generations of poverty, loss of hope, confidence and self-esteem, and general marginalisation reflected in over-representation in statistics of crime, educational failure and ill health. I, and my country, don’t have any moral high ground here. But believe me when I say that Australia seriously needs to sort its shit out re: treatment of Aboriginal Australians.

N.B. Because the term was so commonly used for so long, a lot of people still don’t know that ‘Aborigine’ is incorrect and can be taken as a slur. Just a note that I hope will be helpful, because, like me until not long ago, you may have been using the word without realising it’s not okay.

the more you knowindigenous peopleAustraliaNew Zealand
sea-sic
gryffindorgeek7777:
“ mad-piper-with-a-box:
“ thetomska:
“ giddytf2:
“ the-last-teabender:
“ Robin Thicke is unapologetic about how rapey ‘Blurred Lines’ is, meanwhile the dude who parodied it issues a public apology for one word.
”
And that is just...
the-last-teabender

Robin Thicke is unapologetic about how rapey ‘Blurred Lines’ is, meanwhile the dude who parodied it issues a public apology for one word.

giddytf2

And that is just one reason why I love Weird Al.

thetomska

It’s great that he’s addressed this but are we really supposed to believe that NO ONE during the extremely lengthy processes of writing a song, recording it, mastering it and animating the music video wouldn’t have brought it up?
mad-piper-with-a-box

Excuse me but how the hell is spastic even remotely insulting?

gryffindorgeek7777

So I just recently learned that in the UK calling someone spastic means the same thing as calling someone retarded, only much worse.

If it makes people in the UK feel any better, people in the US literally do not know this (like literally no one I have ever met and/or know). Here being spastic is usually meant to mean something along the lines of acting like a hyper-active child (like running around in circles yelling just because they feel like it please be quiet for just 2 minutes type of child). NOBODY here uses it as a slur.

Since Weird Al is a US musician and the US music industry is pretty non-international, yeah actually I think its entirely possible that none of the people who worked on this song actually knew that spastic was considered an awful slur in some parts of the world.

And I’m like 99.9999% sure that Weird Al is genuinely very sorry that he was accidentally offensive.

spockvarietyhour

You learn something new every day.

We don’t use it as a slur in the U.S. I mean we use in in medical terminology: Spastic Colon (aka Irritable Bowel Syndrome or IBS). 

SpasticThe More you knowSpazIBS
airyairyquitecontrary-deactivat
mewchamp

"Ew you’re a guy and like the color pink are you gay?"

image

popculturesavvyangel

I’ve been waiting for this post all my life

indigobluerose

WHAT IN THE FLYING HELL I DID NOT MAKE THIS CONNECTION THIS WAS ALREADY STUPID BUT WHY IN THE CRIMENY CRAP ARE WE DRESSING OUR BABIES ACCORDING TO THE CHROMATICAL OPINIONS OF HITLER

airyairyquitecontrary

It’s not as simple as ‘Hitler,’ though I’m not ruling out the possibility that the use of the pink triangle stigmatised the colour pink (though it wouldn’t be logical to say it feminised the colour in people’s eyes, however ‘effeminate’ homosexual men are stereotypically thought to be). However, the pink/blue divide didn’t simply flip, because there wasn’t a clear, universally-agreed upon divide for many years. Here’s a good article about the colour-gendering of baby clothes from the Smithsonian.

One noteworthy bit:

In 1927, Time magazine printed a chart showing sex-appropriate colors for girls and boys according to leading U.S. stores. In Boston, Filene’s told parents to dress boys in pink. So did Best & Co. in New York City, Halle’s in Cleveland and Marshall Field in Chicago.”

Though I don’t suppose Hitler made many decisions based specifically upon the advice of Filene’s or Marshall Field.

Anyway, my point is, it wasn’t a simple flip of an existing dichotomy. Plus before pink and blue, and other pastels, became popular in the early twentieth century, babies were almost universally dressed in white whatever their sex, because white clothes could be bleached and all matched each other. It wasn’t a tradition Hitler would have grown up with and internalised; he was born in the days of white baby clothes (also of little boys and girls being dressed the same, in dresses, through the toddler stage).

Here, and I felt really weird googling for this, is a photo of Adolf Hitler as a baby, wearing an unflattering haircut and a little white dress:

image

Plus plus, the person in the gifs (I don’t know who that is) is generalising ‘the entire world’ when the pink/blue thing is most certainly not worldwide.

the more you know
percychekov-deactivated20180908

Since her death in 1979, the woman who discovered what the universe is made of has not so much as received a memorial plaque. Her newspaper obituaries do not mention her greatest discovery. […] Every high school student knows that Isaac Newton discovered gravity, that Charles Darwin discovered evolution, and that Albert Einstein discovered the relativity of time. But when it comes to the composition of our universe, the textbooks simply say that the most abundant atom in the universe is hydrogen. And no one ever wonders how we know.

Jeremy Knowles, discussing the complete lack of recognition Cecilia Payne gets, even today, for her revolutionary discovery. (via alliterate)

OH WAIT LEMME TELL YOU ABOUT CECILIA PAYNE.

Cecilia Payne’s mother refused to spend money on her college education, so she won a scholarship to Cambridge.

Cecilia Payne completed her studies, but Cambridge wouldn’t give her a degree because she was a woman, so she said fuck that and moved to the United States to work at Harvard.

Cecilia Payne was the first person ever to earn a Ph.D. in astronomy from Radcliffe College, with what Otto Strauve called “the most brilliant Ph.D. thesis ever written in astronomy.”

Not only did Cecilia Payne discover what the universe is made of, she also discovered what the sun is made of (Henry Norris Russell, a fellow astronomer, is usually given credit for discovering that the sun’s composition is different from the Earth’s, but he came to his conclusions four years later than Payne—after telling her not to publish).

Cecilia Payne is the reason we know basically anything about variable stars (stars whose brightness as seen from earth fluctuates). Literally every other study on variable stars is based on her work.

Cecilia Payne was the first woman to be promoted to full professor from within Harvard, and is often credited with breaking the glass ceiling for women in the Harvard science department and in astronomy, as well as inspiring entire generations of women to take up science.

Cecilia Payne is awesome and everyone should know her.

(via bansheewhale)

spockvarietyhour

Jeremy Knowles, discussing the complete lack of recognition Cecilia Payne gets, even today, for her revolutionary discovery. (via alliterate)

OH WAIT LEMME TELL YOU ABOUT CECILIA PAYNE.

Cecilia Payne’s mother refused to spend money on her college education, so she won a scholarship to Cambridge.

Cecilia Payne completed her studies, but Cambridge wouldn’t give her a degree because she was a woman, so she said fuck that and moved to the United States to work at Harvard.

Cecilia Payne was the first person ever to earn a Ph.D. in astronomy from Radcliffe College, with what Otto Strauve called “the most brilliant Ph.D. thesis ever written in astronomy.”

Not only did Cecilia Payne discover what the universe is made of, she also discovered what the sun is made of (Henry Norris Russell, a fellow astronomer, is usually given credit for discovering that the sun’s composition is different from the Earth’s, but he came to his conclusions four years later than Payne—after telling her not to publish).

Cecilia Payne is the reason we know basically anything about variable stars (stars whose brightness as seen from earth fluctuates). Literally every other study on variable stars is based on her work.

Cecilia Payne was the first woman to be promoted to full professor from within Harvard, and is often credited with breaking the glass ceiling for women in the Harvard science department and in astronomy, as well as inspiring entire generations of women to take up science.

Cecilia Payne is awesome and everyone should know her.

(via bansheewhale)

Cecilia Paynethe more you know
airyairyquitecontrary-deactivat

Americans exchange diamond rings as part of the engagement process, because in 1938 De Beers decided that they would like us to. Prior to a stunningly successful marketing campaign 1938, Americans occasionally exchanged engagement rings, but wasn’t a pervasive occurrence. Not only is the demand for diamonds a marketing invention, but diamonds aren’t actually that rare. Only by carefully restricting the supply has De Beers kept the price of a diamond high.

Rohin Dhar, Diamonds are Bullshit (via fourteendrawings)

the more you know